🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of nations are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for platforms to self-regulate.